FairQR vs QR Tiger: the factual comparison
This page compares FairQR and QR Tiger on verifiable facts: pricing model, free-tier limits and data portability (as of July 2026). We do not cite an independent Trustpilot score for QR Tiger, so none is claimed here.
Third-party ratings and prices can change at any time. The figures shown here reflect our research as of July 2026 and can be checked via the sources linked below; for the current value, please refer to the respective source. This comparison is provided as factual information based on verifiable criteria and is not intended to disparage any competitor.
| QR Tiger | FairQR | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription-based | One-time payment (Starter €29 / Business €59) |
| Cost over 3 years | Recurring subscription; no one-time option (see QR Tiger for current pricing) | €29-€59 once; €0 recurring |
| Free tier / if you stop paying | Subscription-based; the free tier has documented scan caps and expiry | Static codes free forever; dynamic codes with no recurring fee; 12 months' notice + export if wound down |
| Scan limits | Free tier: documented scan caps / expiry | Unlimited scans |
| Data export | See provider terms | Full export: CSV, .htaccess, JSON |
QR Tiger is a subscription service for dynamic QR codes. FairQR charges a single one-time fee (Starter €29 or Business €59) with no subscription; static QR codes are free forever.
QR Tiger's free tier carries documented scan caps and expiry, which means a free dynamic code can stop resolving once those limits are hit. FairQR's dynamic codes have unlimited scans and no expiry tied to payment.
For data portability, FairQR provides cookie-less scan statistics and full export (CSV, .htaccess, JSON). The longevity promise adds 12 months' notice and export tooling if FairQR is ever discontinued.